Education, History, Politics, Satire, Social Commentary, Socialist

Expedient Evolution

What causes someone, particularly those who are in power, to change a conviction that is so deeply held that it is a part of a person’s identity?  The term evolution is associated with biology class and how lifeforms change over time.  However, in the political realm, if someone were to evolve they had a change of mind, and possibly heart, on various issues.  Many theories about evolution claim human beings were reptiles at one point in time and they evolved into the human beings that we know and hate.  In a symbolic sense, to devolve entails returning to the reptile stage because comparing a person to a reptile is an insult in our culture.  Looking at this in a skeptical light, politicians who change their views should be more closely associated with chameleons for their ability to blend into a background.  Like a chameleon, they adapt their outer appearance to their surroundings, but they are the same person inside.

On the surface, changing a stance on an issue is smart because agreeing with other people makes them more likable.  Likability is a major factor in getting people to support them no matter what the profession is because being likable means one can stay in that position and has more job security.  Being in tune with those in power in power requires certain personality traits, agreeableness being a big one, makes one more appealing.  Conversely, a politician who can read people and get them to support them will stand a better chance of getting elected.  A truly skillful person can adapt their views in a way that appears seamless and has very few inconsistences.  This task is made all the more difficult because over time people change their minds.

Unless someone is good enough to predict the future, most people have views that will appear retrograde fifty years in the future.  The trick to convincing people is to make it appear that they are not too transparent in their changing mindset.  It is amazing to hear a politician claim to be the voice of the people around election time, yet in the interim that populace streak is nowhere to be found.  On the opposite side, powerless people, especially ones from marginalized groups, may hide their true opinions in order to not offend those who are in power.  Go along to get along is a tough pill to swallow, but can be important for their career.  The difference is that for the marginalized group this is more of a survival tactic, while a politicians shifting views is an attempt to get/remain in power.

People say the admire conviction, but depending on ones status in society that may not work in their favor.  For those who are in power, especially politicians, any reptile is an apt metaphor for their behavior with snake being the best comparison.  Powerless people have to become chameleons in order to get their foot in the door.  Whenever the powerful adopt the chameleon traits they appear more snakelike because it is not necessary for them to do so.  The truth of the matter is that everyone has to make changes in their viewpoints, because if they don’t the world will leave them behind and the world can be a lonely place.  If people were completely honest all of the time and said what they really thought nobody would like them, because without a façade, most flaws would make them remotely attractive.

Advertisements
Standard
Education, History, Politics, Satire, Social Commentary, Socialist

Lucrative Love

Money can’t buy happiness is a cliché that feels nice to say, but is often contradicted by reality.  Another popular belief is that the key to happiness is having close, meaningful relationships with fellow human beings.  The thinking person would realize the link between close relationships and financial security is strong because money serves as a status marker.  Being financially secure leads to a greater opportunity to maintaining strong relationships because money not only buys access, but provides emotional security that allows one to confidently interact with others.  In a twisted way money serves as a form of Social Darwinism that creates winners and losers based on the luck of the draw.

The Social Darwinist nature of capitalism makes people strive to their utmost ability to prove themselves worthy of being acknowledged.  Everyone is entered into an unspoken competition with each other over friendships, companionship, and even the opportunity to improve ones status.  People want to cozy up to those with money so that they can have access to those who are well connected.  When it comes to the game of love, every woman is turned into a queen who rules the castle, not with an iron fist, but with a seductive gaze.  Improving ones status just makes someone exponentially a lot more appealing to be surrounded by.  Relations between two people always carries an imbalance of power: usually favoring males who have money and are seen as being powerful.  Men with money and power provide women with a sense of security that women can’t attain their own because men stand at the gates to keep them from true equality.

Attractiveness is subjective and the reason why some couples are together may not be clear by looking at them, but some couples stay in relationships and love is not the reason.  Another way of thinking of this is that having the appearance of being able to blunt any effects of an economic downturn makes them into the man of their dreams.  Being in this position allows men to be seen as naturally superior when that status is more the result of winning the lottery of life. On a related note, men who are born poor who never escape those material conditions, or are a part of a marginalized group have their mate value decreased substantially.  Men who are considered to have a low mate value will feel inadequate and possibly lash out at the world because they were thrown into the caste system of undesirables.

Having money and power leads to respect and the desire for people to bask in the light of the godhood they radiate.  People of high privilege and status tend to develop a sense of entitlement that will spill over into other areas of their life.  Men of more meager means who lack access to greater sources of power will fall behind and develop an inferiority complex because they do not measure up to arbitrary standards of desirability.  Resentment will build until the spirit becomes moribund, and little joy can be found in life.  Life situations such as this showcases the folly of thinking America is a classless society.

 

Standard
Education, History, Politics, Satire, Social Commentary, Socialist

Funny Thing About Feuds

Very few situations a person can find themselves in that are as emotionally taxing and devastating as being in a feud.  In works of fictions feuds are what makes stories dynamic and compelling enough to keep the readers attention, provided that the feud is surrounded by a compelling narrative.  Classic battles between the forces of good and evil continues to fascinate the public because that conflict covers familiar ground.  The reductive nature of good versus evil does not challenge people to think, which gets in the way of being entertained which works out well for attracting audiences.  Even our amorphous concept of reality people like to have a binary view of life situations because labeling things makes information much easier to process.  However, in real life feuds are hardly this simple when viewed through a critical lens.

The beginning of every feud starts off with ourselves or the side that we identify with as being the hero in any given situation.  Escaping a tendentious starting point is not easy and requires attempting to see the world through the antagonist point of view.  Being part of a feud makes walking in another person’s shoes difficult because they are seen as the enemy.  The value of trying to see the other person’s viewpoint is that it could provide new insight about how best to go about winning the feud.  This analysis presupposes that a feud is hostile and not a friendly rivalry for the sake of boosting ones own ego.  The semantics involved thus far implies that the participants are not on cordial terms.

People are attracted to feuds because strong, passionate feuds are what makes for the best, legendary stories in history.  War is a concept that comes to mind as it is so often framed in the history books that people read as kids.  One would be hard pressed to look through an American history text book and not find war being glamorized.  A large part of this is that binary thinking that eliminates nuance and sides in a conflict are reduced to pure evil or the brightest good.  One contradiction that people often have when picking sides in a conflict is that people say that they support the underdog, but they also want to back the perceived winner.  Inconsistencies such as this turns the concept of loyalty moot and support becomes merely a horse race.  The truth of the matter is that we vicariously wish to be on the winning side in a feud regardless if the side that wins is the underdog or the elite.

In large part, getting involved in a feud in our personal lives is unavoidable, but the damage can be mitigated with some wise thought and actions.  If one side approaches the conflict with a cool head and manages to maintain that mental condition events can proceed with much less drama.  The big problem with this approach is that emotions override logic and when tempers flare the conflagration can easily engulf everyone involved in the feud.  One side can attempt to put out the fire or all parties will be consumed by the flames.  A cool head can accelerate the process of the flames dying out if the other side does not add gasoline.  All things considered, the ending of a feud is determined by the intensity of the feud and the desire to douse the flames.

Standard
History, Politics, Satire, Social Commentary, Socialist

Fascist Times

Warning: This is meant to be a satirical piece whose essence can be found on conservative media platforms all the time.

If there is one magazine that could succeed in a dying industry, it would have to be called Fascist Times. A nostalgic publication for those who wish to return to a simpler time: the good old days when everyone adhered to an unspoken hierarchy where lighter pigment connoted superiority. The magazine would tell readers every conspiracy theory they would need to know about who controls the world. Revealing the truth behind the liberal media, the benefits of assortative mating with those who are culturally similar, and how white people are being left behind in a country they built without genocide or slavery. By studying the greatest agitprop artist, readers will be given the knowledge on how to take the power back from those who they have continuously oppressed. The magazine would lead readers towards a vision of society as it would be if people just knew their place.

History has been distorted and must be corrected by the white light of virtue and a virtuous white washing of historical figures. Social justice warriors want the real history to be darkened by shoehorning minorities into the history books with accomplishments and contributions to society. Greatness and superiority will be returned to great nation that has lost its lust for war, conquest, and colonization. Glorious people will find a lost cause to champion and take their rightful place in the pantheon of revisionist history. Cultural leftist and their inherently base values such as getting paid for work and equality will be shown as a fraud that hurts their cause instead of helping it. This magazine would take an eraser through history and rewrite the truth.

Through unity shall a new age be born where the best example of Americans shall rise from the swamp, hills, and farms to take a stolen country back. Readers would come from an amazing stock through a culture of selective inbreeding to prove their purity. Proud soldiers will march down the street without hoods, bloody white sheets, or red shirts. Past battles will be reenacted and acts of terrorism will be celebrated if the victims come from marginalized groups. Actions that are normally seen as reprehensible will be redeemed because it is the will of god.

Fascist Times certainly describes a period of time when fascist are elected through a system that is plausibly a democracy. Fascist activism is triggered when people take to the streets in a paranoid style when they believe their status is at stake. The so-called movement receives support from the active indifference to suffering of others based on tacit tribal support and believe some lives matter more than others. Americans naively think they are the exception to oncoming signs of fascism which could be its downfall. A furtive form of fascism will congeal if the right ingredients are mixed together; which America has in abundance.

Standard
Education, History, Politics, Satire, Social Commentary, Socialist

Stone Age of History

The stone age did not end because the cavemen ran out of stones, as demonstrated by the fact that the masonry business is still in existence. What happened is that over time humanity evolves and advances beyond even its own preconceived notions. Although related to technology, this concept is important when accurately accessing the events of history and how those events should be viewed. Are major historical events collective efforts that sprung seemingly out of nowhere, or did some charismatic individual create the spark that led to major changes?

This brings the question of the chicken or the egg to the forefront of which is more important to focus on; individuals or a cohesive mass that rises up? American culture, with its individual ethos, favors major changes being made by individuals. This is a shallow view because this notion prevents people from seeing a deeper, richer, version of history that acknowledges the contributions of nameless foot soldiers. Another factor that influences major historical change is a change in cultural zeitgeist.

Keeping in mind the zeitgeist is important because they form the charismatic figures that are often studied in the history books. In all likelihood, the charismatic figures in the history books were aware of the changing mood of their environment, and seized it to create immediate change. People like sensational stories, this accounts for the popular viewpoint which ignores the possibility that other people could be doing similar things at the same time, but for some reason they are forgotten to history.

Those who are in power tend to define the popular narrative that history remembers. Once this narrative is set in the minds of people, any alterations attempted is extremely difficult to enact. When the stone age ended something better replaced it, which is a constant goal of human beings. This is the hope that we should have for humanity, that the next era will be better than the one that preceded it.

Standard
A Nonconformist View, Education, History, Politics, Satire, Social Commentary, Socialist

Empathy Trap

There is a belief among many intellectuals, especially psychologist, that the best way to make peace with other people is through empathy. The reasoning is that putting oneself in the shoes of another and trying to mentally channel their experiences will create a sense of understanding by creating emotional bridges. In theory, if one is empathic enough, ones original feelings will be replaced with the person they are trying to understand. This sense of understanding can be a good thing or a bad thing depending upon the views of the one who is being reached out to. As great as this may appear this could be, this situation could be problematic if one adopts pernicious views of another, thus making them indifferent to the suffering of others.

Shame is seen as the antithesis of empathy because instead of building a bridge, shame makes people crawl into their silos. This is a dark silo that they would do anything to get out of so they can show their true selves without reproach. They would be happy to answer the clarion call of a demagogue who will arouse the spirit and inspire them to express disdain for marginalized groups. The aura of hate that will be generated will seem natural to them and externally destructive to the target of hate. These targets are easy pickings because they were never allowed to assimilate and have to fear their fellow countrymen.

Due to the power structure, it is those who are in power who are entitled to empathy because of who is seen as deserving. No matter how much hate is in the hearts of the powerful, society constantly urges us to treat their concerns as paramount even when espousing hate. What makes matters worse is that the majority relates to those who look like them more than the minorities who are in the same economic class. The views of minorities are often shut out to make way for members of the majority to talk about how civilization is decaying. The cause of that decay is a mongrel horde who are seeking equality which is framed as a takeover.

People speak as if empathy is the best trait one could have because empathy bridges gaps and nourishes humanities thirst for companionship. However, empathy can be dangerous because it can serve to condone hateful views that cause pain and misery to minorities. An important factor that contributes to this problem is if people can relate to those espousing hateful views, and the worst part is that some do not realize how their hate destroys humanity. The ultimate effect of having empathy for hate is that good intentions will turn into a cover for views that are verbally condemned, but tacitly supported.

Standard
History, Politics, Satire, Social Commentary, Socialist

Statistical Flaw

Statistics are numbers on a sheet of paper that are meaningless without proper interpretation. Many people lack the understanding of analyzing through numbers because of the complexity of how data may be gathered, the source of the data, and interest of the reader. Because of these factors the simple truth is that if someone wants to change minds, their best bet is to reach a person on the emotional level. In other words, reaching the reptilian brain is the key to getting a person see another point of view.

Being successful in the art of persuasion requires one has to use logic in order to understand the emotions of the target audience. In a perfect world, logic would play a much greater role in decision making and appeal to others. People have needs and one time tested way of getting to a persons mind is to create a need for the audience they never knew they wanted. The goal is to get into a person’s mind and convince them that they truly care about solving their problems. Making a manufactured, superficial connection appear genuine in order to bend a person to their will.

At its core, every decision made about any given situation is a gut or emotional one. In American society today the difference between wants and needs is often obfuscated. To a great extent, the need for conformity and keep up with the Jones’ becomes a motivation for devoting resources towards things that could be directed toward more positive means. This concept gets to very disturbing question; has logic become so withered that it is easy to manipulate the masses and individual?

Numbers on a sheet of paper can tell a lot about a person and stories overall. The problem with relying on numbers alone is that they are abstract and in appealing to people requires making concepts concrete. Whether a person or a product is marketed, an emotional chord must be struck in order to be successful. In a sense the goal in life is to find eternal happiness, and someone is willing to sell it for a price. Statistics do not provide a clear cut answer, but at best they can help guide the way.

Standard